When Am I?: How Historiography Can Inform Positionality in HCI
2026. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Positionality is rapidly becoming an accepted and necessary aspect of conducting well contextualised and reflected research in HCI, yet it remains controversial. This short paper compares and contrasts the nature of positionality in HCI against the position of a historian and their facts, as the two can share some similarities but more importantly the comparison can show the impact that time and reflection can have on the way the author situates themselves and their work in the broader trends of society and culture. We take two pieces of respected and long-standing historiography and use them to situate current discourse of positionality in HCI to reveal methods, techniques and perspectives from the study of History that can be leveraged by the HCI practitioner.
Full paper
https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3772363.3798660
Citation
Stuart Clark, R. (2026). When am i?: how historiography can inform positionality in hci. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–5).
BibTeX
@inproceedings{stuart2026historiography, title={When Am I?: How Historiography Can Inform Positionality in HCI}, author={Stuart Clark, Rory}, booktitle={Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems}, pages={1--5}, year={2026} }